The Science of Getting Rich by Wallace D. Wattles: A Book Review

Book: The Science of Getting Rich  by Wallace D. Wattles

Page Count: 146

First Publication: Elizabeth Towne Company

First Edition: 1910

Summary

The Science of Getting Rich is a self-help book written by New Thought Movement writer Wallace D. Wattles. First published in 1910, the book has remained in print for over a century, going through multiple editions from various publishers.

This book is part of a series by Wattles, including The Science of Being Well (1910), which explores health through the New Thought philosophy, and The Science of Being Great (1911), a guide to personal development. When originally published, all three books had matching covers, reinforcing their connection as a trilogy.

The book is heavily influenced by Hindu philosophies, particularly the concept that "One is All, and All is One." It asserts that thought is the creative force that manifests tangible riches. By shaping ideas in the mind and focusing deeply on them, a person can influence the unseen creative energy of the universe to bring those ideas into reality.

Core Principles of the Book:

(1) The Right to Be Rich: Wealth is a natural right, and seeking riches is a noble pursuit.

(2) Thinking in a Certain Way: Your thoughts shape your reality; think creatively, not competitively.

(3) Gratitude: Cultivate gratitude for what you have and for what is yet to come.

(4) Creative Mindset: Focus on creating value rather than competing for limited resources.

(5) Clear Vision: Define your purpose and visualize your desired outcome.

(6) Efficient Action: Take purposeful, well-planned actions toward your goals.

(7) Faith and Belief: Trust in the process and believe in your ability to achieve wealth.

(8) The Law of Attraction: Like attracts like; align your thoughts and actions with abundance.

(9) Living in the Present: Focus on the present moment while working toward your future.

(10) Giving and Receiving: Contribute value to others, and wealth will flow back to you.

Positive Side of the Book

As stated in the very first line of the preface, this book is practical, not philosophical—a manual, not a theoretical treatise. Wattles is so confident in his teachings that he advises readers not to read other materials that contradict his principles, claiming that this book alone is sufficient to manifest wealth and abundance. Such a strong statement could either come from blind faith or from deep conviction backed by experience.

One of the strengths of the book is its simplicity. Wattles presents wealth-building as a science rather than a mystery, making it accessible to anyone willing to apply his principles. Unlike many modern self-help books that are lengthy and repetitive, The Science of Getting Rich is concise and to the point.

Moreover, the book encourages ethical wealth-building. Wattles emphasizes creating value rather than competing for limited resources, making wealth accumulation a process that benefits both the individual and society. Readers willing to experiment with the action steps outlined in the book may find themselves drawn to a new way of thinking and operating in the world.

Negative Side of the Book

Despite its inspiring message, the book is often criticized for the lack of practical financial advice. The principles it teaches are largely based on the law of attraction and positive thinking rather than concrete wealth-building strategies such as investment, business planning, or money management.

Many critics have labeled the book as pseudoscientific, arguing that it oversimplifies success by suggesting that wealth is purely a matter of mindset. While belief and visualization can be powerful, external factors such as economic conditions, education, and opportunities also play a significant role in financial success.

Another potential downside is that readers may become overly reliant on the concept of thinking in a Certain Way without taking the necessary actions to achieve their goals. Some may fall into the trap of endlessly consuming similar self-help materials without ever applying the principles, leading to little or no real change in their lives.

Conclusion

Like most self-help books, The Science of Getting Rich is a quick read, but the real challenge lies in applying its principles consistently over time. While some may find Wattles’ advice limiting, especially his suggestion to avoid reading conflicting materials, this approach might actually help readers stay focused on implementing the book’s teachings without distraction.

For those who resonate with this book, Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill offers a similar philosophy with additional insights. However, readers seeking practical financial strategies should supplement Wattles’ ideas with modern financial education.

Ultimately, The Science of Getting Rich remains an influential classic, inspiring readers to cultivate a mindset of abundance, take decisive action, and pursue wealth with confidence. Whether one fully agrees with its approach or not, the book offers thought-provoking insights into the power of belief, visualization, and purposeful action in achieving success.

Words from the Book

“There are three motives for which we live; we live for the body, we live for the mind, we live for the soul. No one of these is better or holier than the other; all are alike desirable, and no one of the three—body, mind, or soul—can live fully if either of the others is cut short of full life and expression.”

Rajendra Maharjan

Contact: teacher.rajen@gmail.com

Animal Farm by George Orwell: A Book Review

Book: Animal Farm by George Orwell

Page Count: 92

First Publication: Secker & Warburg, UK

First Edition: 1945

Summary

Animal Farm is a political satirical novella brilliantly written by George Orwell (pen name for Eric Arthur Blair). The brilliance in Orwell’s writing is evidenced by the fact that in 2008, The Times named George Orwell the second-greatest British writer since 1945. Animal Farm tells the story of a group of anthropomorphic farm animals who rebel against their human farmer, hoping to build a society based on equality, freedom, and happiness. However, their success is short-lived as they soon find themselves in an even worse situation under an authoritarian ruler who constantly manipulates the very principles they fought for, ensuring he holds absolute power.  

The story begins with the “Manor Farm”, owned by a farmer named Jones, who fails to manage the farm properly. The animals rebel against this farmer, take over the farm, and change the name of the farm to “Animal Farm”. The farm is fully operated by the animals for the animals, under the leadership of the pigs named Napoleon and Snowball. Napoleon is portrayed as a corrupted leader and Snowball as a leader who lives for idealistic values and principles that benefit the whole of society. At one point, Napoleon uses the fierce dogs he secretly raised to drive Snowball off the farm. Napoleon seizes absolute control of the farm, and from that moment, the animals’ suffering begins. As time passes, the living conditions of the other animals worsen, while Napoleon and his inner circle indulge in every luxury imaginable. Napoleon implements changes so subtly and persuasively that the animals remain convinced they are better off than under human rule. It is only after a series of grim events that they come to realize the rebellion—founded on the belief that humans are evil and all animals are equal—has ultimately led to their leader forming an alliance with humans, becoming one of them, and enforcing the notion that while all animals are equal, some are more equal than others.

Positive Side of the Book

Although Animal Farm is said to be a political satire against Joseph Stalin’s rule in the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution of 1917, amazingly, the allegory depicts the situation of many countries even today. It would not be false to state that Animal Farm exactly portrays the Communist movement in Nepal. Having closely observed the Communist movement in Nepal, there is no doubt that the political events here have unfolded almost exactly as depicted in the book.

One of Orwell’s greatest strengths is his ability to craft deeply realistic characters, each embodying different aspects of political ideologies and human nature. There are different characters that we can easily relate to. The idea of the rebellion is initiated by the Old Major, an old pig, who firmly believes in idealistic principles of freedom, equality, justice, etc. After his passing away, another pig named Snowball, a leader, is characterised as a firm follower of the principles introduced by the Old Major. Napoleon, another pig, represents a leader who is a total authoritarian and who is ready to overthrow anyone who does not agree with him and who keeps twisting the principles to stay in power, forming allies even with the enemies. Squealer, a young porker, serves Napoleon in all his deeds. Squealer is so smart that he can convince all the animals that Napoleon is always right. Then there are various other characters, like sheep, who are blind followers of their leader. Then, there is a loyal follower, a horse named Boxer, who works extremely hard with total faith that the authority is creating a better world for all. There is an old donkey named Benjamin, who does not believe there will be change in their lives with the revolution in the political system. He believes life always goes bad, irrespective of any political system. All these and other characters whose opinion regarding the political system differs make this novel so realistic.

The book is so captivating that the readers would not want to put it down for being anxious on how the story will unfold in the following pages. 

Negative Side of the Book

This book critiques totalitarianism by illustrating its negative consequences, but it does not explicitly propose solutions. While its message about power and corruption is compelling, some critics argue that Orwell oversimplifies political systems.

Like any political work, the book has faced mixed reactions. Not everyone agrees with its stance against totalitarian rule, and some readers may find its pessimistic tone discouraging.

The book has been banned in Cuba and North Korea due to its satirical critique of totalitarianism and communism. Booksellers in Iran have been warned against selling Orwell’s works, including Animal Farm, for the same reasons. In 1991, Kenya banned a play based on Animal Farm because it was seen as a direct attack on the Kenyan government and could incite rebellion. Animal Farm is still censored in Vietnam.

The United Arab Emirates banned the book in 2002 due to its depiction of talking pigs, which was considered contrary to Islamic values.

Animal Farm has faced bans or restrictions in several countries, primarily due to its political content and, in some cases, religious considerations. These bans highlight the book's ongoing political relevance and the fear it instills in oppressive regimes.

Conclusion

Animal Farm is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding how political structures shape society. It serves as a powerful eye-opener, especially for those who blindly follow political leaders or ideologies. Despite its brevity, the book carries profound depth, offering multiple layers of interpretation that engage thoughtful readers in a long and meaningful reflection.

All readers are equal, but some readers are more equal than others. However, many readers will find Animal Farm to be an unforgettable masterpiece. It is hard to deny the book’s lasting impact and relevance in today’s world.

Words from the Book

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

Rajendra Maharjan

Contact: teacher.rajen@gmail.com